Abstract

Facilitating research and enhancing community research capacity through a partnered approach in Inuit Nunangat (the Inuit homeland of Canada, located in Arctic Canada) presents learning opportunities and challenges for southern-based, non-Inuit researchers and community members alike. This article outlines lessons learned through the Arctic Corridors and Northern Voices (AC-NV) project, which involved 14 communities across Inuit Nunangat. The AC-NV focused on understanding community-identified impacts and potential management options of increased shipping in Inuit Nunangat due to sea ice reductions and a changing climate. The approach used to conduct the research involved visiting researchers and community partners working together with local organizations, and training and hiring northern youth as cultural liaisons and workshop co-facilitators. We strove to develop a model of collaborative partnership and strong north-south research relationships. In this paper, we draw on our broad learning experiences from four community case studies conducted as part of the AC-NV project: Arviat, Cambridge Bay, Gjoa Haven, and Pond Inlet, Nunavut. Close partnerships were formed in each of these communities, and 32 youth were trained in participatory mapping and workshop facilitation. For our diverse team of Inuit, northern- (i.e., non-Inuit, living in Inuit Nunangat), and southern-based non-Inuit researchers, our efforts to engage in partnered research were a critical component of the research and learning experience. In this article we share methodological reflections and lessons learned from what collaborative-partnered research means in practice. In so doing, we aim to contribute to the increasing dialogue and efforts around knowledge co-production and Inuit self-determination in research. Key conclusions of this reflective exercise include the importance of 1) conducting research that is relevant to local needs and interests, 2) visiting researchers and local organizations partnering together, 3) co-creating and refining knowledge documentation tools, 4) including youth cultural liaisons as co-facilitators, 5) conducting results validation and sharing exercises, and 6) being open to forming personal friendships. For the AC-NV, this community-based partnership approach resulted in more robust research results, strengthened north-south relations, and enhanced local capacity for community-led projects.

Highlights

  • Inclusion of Indigenous rights holders’ perspectives in decision-making structures across Canada has been clearly articulated in the reconciliation mandate of Canada’s current federal government (Department of Justice Canada, 2018)

  • Working together offered distinct research-related benefits and challenges, and in the process we learned many valuable lessons, including the importance of 1) conducting research that is relevant to local needs and interests, 2) visiting researchers and local organizations partnering together, 3) co-creation and refinement of knowledge documentation tools, 4) including youth cultural liaisons as co-facilitators, 5) conducting results validation and sharing exercises, and 6) being open to forming personal friendships

  • It is widely recognized that for research to be beneficial for Inuit communities and to spark meaningful community engagement, the research must be relevant to local needs and interests (Laidler, 2006; Gearheard and Shirley, 2007; Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK) and NRI, 2007; Ogden and Thomas, 2013; MacDonald and Wachowich, 2018)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inclusion of Indigenous rights holders’ perspectives in decision-making structures across Canada has been clearly articulated in the reconciliation mandate of Canada’s current federal government (Department of Justice Canada, 2018). Significant effort and steps are being taken toward reconciliation and shared leadership approaches with Indigenous peoples through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRCC, 2015), the 2016 U.S.Canada Joint Statement on Climate, Energy, and Arctic Leadership (OPM, 2016a), the 2018 Recognition and Implementation of Rights Framework (OPM, 2018), and implementation of the 2018 Principles Respecting the Government of Canada’s Relationships with Indigenous Peoples (Department of Justice Canada, 2018) In addition to this federal focus on reconciliation in Canada, there is a strong commitment among decision makers to evidencebased decision making and support for science and research to inform decisions (Advisory Panel for the Review of Federal Support for Fundamental Science, 2017). This legacy has had a lasting impact on Inuit peoples and continues to be reflected in current approaches to research governance, funding, policies, and practices” (ITK, 2018a:4, 5)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.