Abstract

Despite the rapid increase of size in phylogenomic data sets, a number of important nodes on animal phylogeny are still unresolved. Among these, the rooting of the placental mammal tree is still a controversial issue. One difficulty lies in the pervasive phylogenetic conflicts among genes, with each one telling its own story, which may be reliable or not. Here, we identified a simple criterion, that is, the GC content, which substantially helps in determining which gene trees best reflect the species tree. We assessed the ability of 13,111 coding sequence alignments to correctly reconstruct the placental phylogeny. We found that GC-rich genes induced a higher amount of conflict among gene trees and performed worse than AT-rich genes in retrieving well-supported, consensual nodes on the placental tree. We interpret this GC effect mainly as a consequence of genome-wide variations in recombination rate. Indeed, recombination is known to drive GC-content evolution through GC-biased gene conversion and might be problematic for phylogenetic reconstruction, for instance, in an incomplete lineage sorting context. When we focused on the AT-richest fraction of the data set, the resolution level of the placental phylogeny was greatly increased, and a strong support was obtained in favor of an Afrotheria rooting, that is, Afrotheria as the sister group of all other placentals. We show that in mammals most conflicts among gene trees, which have so far hampered the resolution of the placental tree, are concentrated in the GC-rich regions of the genome. We argue that the GC content-because it is a reliable indicator of the long-term recombination rate-is an informative criterion that could help in identifying the most reliable molecular markers for species tree inference.

Highlights

  • Most evolutionary biology studies rely on a well-resolved phylogenetic tree

  • We found that AT-rich genes are more congruent markers of the species phylogeny than GC-rich genes, on average, and we focused on AT-rich genes to further investigate the difficult nodes of the placental tree

  • Afrotheria and Xenarthra are poorly sampled clades, leading to long ancestral branches that cannot be further divided. These long branches could be prone to attract each other, a risk probably increased in fast-evolving GC-rich genes. These results suggest that Afrotheria might be the true rooting of the placental tree, whereas the Atlantogenata rooting would be a phylogenetic reconstruction artifact due to long-branch attraction of two fast-evolving ingroup lineages

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most evolutionary biology studies rely on a well-resolved phylogenetic tree. Over the last decade, this requirement has been mainly achieved through the use of molecular data. Challenging the classical morphological classification, multigene studies suggested three major clades of placental mammals (Madsen et al 2001; Murphy et al 2001): Afrotheria (e.g., elephants and tenrecs), Xenarthra (e.g., armadillos and sloths), and Boreoeutheria, further divided in two groups, that is, Euarchontoglires (e.g., primates and rodents) and Laurasiatheria (e.g., ruminants, cetaceans, bats, and carnivores). These clades are well established and have been confirmed by several subsequent studies (Delsuc et al 2002; Scally et al 2002; Prasad et al 2008; Meredith et al 2011).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call