Abstract
Development in northern Russian cities is determined by specific economic and social conditions, as well as by natural and climatic factors. Most of these cities were established in the period of the Soviet industrialization and, thus, have a mono-profile character; for that reason, economies of single-industry cities pose high development risks of the “boom-bust” type and the relevant social problems. This paper endeavours to discuss these issues, relying on the case study of Kirovsk (Murmansk region) in order to analyse the urban planning aspects and challenges on the way to sustainability. The main factors (e.g. socio-economic, environmental and land use, institutional) were analysed to learn how they may contribute to sustainable development of Kirovsk as a single-industry town. The role of different stakeholders (mining companies, local communities, and government authorities) in decision making process is discussed. The paper presents the potentials and challenges for a further development of Kirovsk and studies its chances to become a sustainable town. Most challenges are connected with structural and paradigm changes in economy and functionality of enterprises after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Among them are contradictions of interests (e.g. ecological: enterprise owners – citizens), downsizing and depopulation, domestic and foreign market situation, environment pollution and degradation as well as associated health problems linked to the quality of life of the local population. The paper argues that following the long history of industrialization the mining activity is still dominant and has a great influence on the everyday life of urban dwellers. However, Kirovsk also has opportunities to become a sustainable town based on tourism development potential and innovations, development towards environment saving technologies conducted by scientific institutes located there. In addition, participatory approaches (e.g. public participation, involvement of stakeholders and activism of local NGOs) in urban management allow the linkages to be made among specific forms of land use, its management and policies.
Highlights
5 a) What is the current situation in urban development regarding socio-economic aspects, e.g. what will start / has started after industry fall-down / transformation? b) What challenges do these towns / cities face today? c) How do local communities participate in urban planning and development and how do they try to cope with development challenges?materials and methods of investigation; the third section addresses economic restructuring changes after the transition period (“Perestroika”) (1990s), while the final section presents analyses of options which could provide the transition to sustainable development, underlines the strategies for further development, and offers some conclusions
The results presented here are a part of long-term investigations in the framework of several scientific projects: “Ecological buffer territories as an element of modern nature management structure at the Russian North” (N 15-05-02017), “Ecological-cultural role of territories of traditional nature use for sustainable development of the Russian Arctic” (N 15-06-02279), “Detection and mapping of potential nature management conflicts during perspective economic development of the Russian Arctic zone” (N 18-05-00335) and “Mathematical-cartographic assessment of medico-ecological situation in cities of European Russia by using the integrated ecological characteristics” (N 18-05-00236) funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research
4 This paper studies the situation of Kirovsk, which offers an interesting case of transformation in a single-industry town during the post-Soviet time
Summary
5 a) What is the current situation in urban development regarding socio-economic aspects, e.g. what will start / has started after industry fall-down / transformation? b) What challenges do these towns / cities face today? c) How do local communities participate in urban planning and development and how do they try to cope with development challenges (civic engagement)?materials and methods of investigation; the third section addresses economic restructuring changes after the transition period (“Perestroika”) (1990s), while the final section presents analyses of options which could provide the transition to sustainable development, underlines the strategies for further development, and offers some conclusions. 5 a) What is the current situation in urban development regarding socio-economic aspects, e.g. what will start / has started after industry fall-down / transformation? B) What challenges do these towns / cities face today? C) How do local communities participate in urban planning and development and how do they try to cope with development challenges (civic engagement)?. Materials and methods of investigation; the third section addresses economic restructuring changes after the transition period (“Perestroika”) (1990s), while the final section presents analyses of options which could provide the transition to sustainable development, underlines the strategies for further development, and offers some conclusions.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
