Abstract

AbstractThe newest version of shells buckling standard prEN 1993‐1‐6 (2021) adopts linear elastic buckling stress expressions for steel perfect cylinders under axial, circumferential, and torsional effects separately. However, there are no explicit detailed rules that cover the influence of two or more loading combinations on the cylinder buckling resistance, considering a full‐length domain and different boundary conditions. Consequently, this paper looks into such a topic, which will be a useful reference for future research extensions. The examined cylinders were subjected to three loading configurations: axial plus pressure, axial plus torsion, and axial, pressure, and torsion altogether. The finite element (FE) buckling capacities were compared with the prEN 1993‐1‐6 (2021) buckling strengths, from which several findings were obtained. Aspects such as the load configuration applied to a cylinder, the length domain in which a cylinder falls, and the boundary type of a cylinder's ends each led to distinctive and complex descriptions of buckling behavior. The outcomes of this study will in turn assist in developing the current standard prEN 1993‐1‐6 (2021) and its recommendation ECCS EDR5 (2013), particularly the chapter that is relevant to cylindrical shells of constant wall thickness under general loading.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call