Abstract
Introduction: the article analyzes legislative norms regulating the activities of operational units of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. Aim: by analyzing the norms of the current intelligence-gathering, penal enforcement and criminal-procedural legislation, to put forward proposals for introducing amendments to certain norms so as to improve the effectiveness of legal regulation of the activities of operational units of the penal system. Methods: comparative legal method, empirical methods of description and interpretation, theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic. Private scientific methods: legal-dogmatic method and the method of interpretation of legal norms. Results: having analyzed certain norms of the current intelligence-gathering, penal enforcement and criminal-procedural legislation, we see that the norms under consideration are in a certain contradiction, and there are also gaps in the legislative regulation of the activities of operational units of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia. Conclusions: we argue that structural operational units of the territorial and central management bodies of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia can conduct intelligence-gathering activities outside the territory of correctional institutions, including cases when such activities are conducted according to regulations set out as the tasks of intelligence-gathering activities in institutions executing sentences in the form of imprisonment. We also argue that operational units of the territorial bodies of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia can conduct intelligence-gathering activities aimed at establishing the location of convicts, those who have escaped from correctional institutions, their detention and delivery to the investigator (inquirer) for conducting investigative actions. We note legal gaps in the legislative regulation of these measures and propose amendments to legislative acts aimed at improving the effectiveness of law enforcement practice.
Highlights
Speaking about the penal enforcement legislation, we can note that Paragraph 2 of Article 14 of the law under consideration grants the right to carry out intelligence-gathering activity, in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, to operational units of institutions executing punishments
It is worth noting that from the point of view of the legislator, the process of carrying out intelligence-gathering measures to establish the location of the convict by operational units of territorial bodies and by the federal administrative body of FSIN Russia is already questionable, since the wanted person is not located on the territory of the correctional institution and the security territory adjacent to the institution
In accordance with the above norms of penal enforcement law, employees of operational divisions of territorial bodies and the central management body of FSIN Russia have no powers to establish the location of a convicted person who has committed an escape, by conducting intelligence-gathering activities outside a correctional institution
Summary
Speaking about the penal enforcement legislation, we can note that Paragraph 2 of Article 14 of the law under consideration grants the right to carry out intelligence-gathering activity, in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, to operational units of institutions executing punishments.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
