Abstract
CEMAC landlocked countries (specifically Chad and Central African Republic) depend solely on Cameroon who serves as a transit state for the transportation of goods to and from these landlocked countries. Thus, the entering into bilateral conventions helped to facilitate and create transit corridors for the transportation of goods amongst these countries. Meanwhile Cameroon which serves as a transit state to these landlocked countries has four modes of transport (road, rail, water and air), while Chad and Central African Republic have just two or three principal mode of transportation namely road, rail and air. However, these modes of transportation pose unique challenges, particularly in countries with limited infrastructure. Through doctrinal analysis of both primary and secondary sources of data, this article seeks to examine the legal framework in resolving disputes arising from contracts of multimodal carriage of goods available to landlocked countries of the Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC). Our findings revealed that, the legal framework in resolving disputes arising from contracts of multimodal carriage of goods available to landlocked countries are not effectively implemented. As a result, some salient recommendations have been made to bridge the gap between theory and practice amongst these countries in general and Cameroon in particular.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.