Abstract

<p><em>The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal protection of well-known brands. The use of well-known brands at this time has begun to flourish, this is because it promises great benefits to be obtained when using well-known brands rather than using their own brands. Many manufacturers have got around to combining original branded goods with pirated ones, because the pirated is physically similar to the original. In this article</em><em>that what determines a brand is the community because it is the public who knows that a brand is worthy of being famous. So, one way is through Preventive and Repressive Protection in accordance with Law 20 of 2016, there is a need for amendments toa definite measure for the Judge to determine the criteria for a famous mark and also provide criteria that can distinguish the similarity in essence from the overall equation and the philosophical requirements of a brand.</em></p>

Highlights

  • During a prolonged economic crisis such as today, many producers have taken precautions by combining original branded goods with pirated ones, because the pirated is physically similar to the original

  • The results of this study indicate that the registration of a mark may end due to the expiration of the mark's validity period, the deletion of the mark due to the trademark owner's own request, the removal of the registered mark at the initiative of the minister after receiving a recommendation from the Mark Appeal Commission, and the deletion of the mark due to a lawsuit from a third party

  • The results of this study explain that the regulation of famous brands in Law No 20 of 2016 on Brands and Geographical Indications, and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights No 67 of 2016 concerning Trademark Registration do not regulate in detail the meaning and meaning of wellknown brands

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The difference between this study and previous research is that this study focuses more on examining how well-known trademark legal protection is in accordance with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. How is the legal protection for well-known brands in accordance with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications?

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.