Abstract
We consider the importance of legal opportunism as an explanation for observed litigation following a large sample of initial public offerings (IPOs). We characterize legal opportunism as litigation based on the potential to recover losses after negative stock price developments rather than the legal merits. We find the most important predictors of post-IPO litigation activity (both likelihood and settlement amounts) to be ex post legal stakes (i.e., monetary damages plaintiffs could claim), and the remaining wealth available in the firm. Our results suggest a disturbing role for legal activity and starkly contrast existing models of IPO underpricing that focus on ex ante risk factors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
