Abstract

The purpose of this study is to substantiate the need to revise the current legislation in terms of determining the circle of participants in legal relations for the creation and use of official results of intellectual activity. Through scientific research, the creation of inventions, selection achievements and other results of intellectual activity, including official ones, the scientific and technical potential of scientists in the Russian Federation is realized. However, disputes often arise between legal entities (employers) and the creators of the result of intellectual property (employees) on the creation and use of such a result. The author examines the circle of participants in legal relations associated with the creation of a service result of intellectual activity and with its subsequent use. The characteristics of the subjects of the studied relations are given, the problem of defining the work of co-authors as joint is revealed. The conclusion is made about the need to transfer the priority in determining the subjects of legal relations to create an official creative result from the terminology used in labor law to civil law terminology. Provisions are proposed for amending modern legislation, namely: replacing the term «employee» with «author» in the norms on service RIA, and the term «employer» with «employer».

Highlights

  • substantiate the need to revise the current legislation in terms of determining the circle

  • disputes often arise between legal entities

  • The author examines the circle of participants in legal relations associated with the creation of a service result

Read more

Summary

Introduction

В последнее время возросла значимость исследования отношений по поводу создания и использования служебных результатов интеллектуальной деятельности, поскольку их доля среди таких результатов стремительно увеличивается. 1228 Гражданского Кодекса РФ (ГК РФ) автором результата интеллектуальной деятельности (РИД) является гражданин, творческим трудом которого он создан (Гражданский кодекс Российской Федерации (часть четвертая) от 18.12.2006 N 230-ФЗ). При этом если граждан не внёс в создание РИД личного творческого вклада, а также только способствовал оформлению прав на творческий результат либо осуществлял контроль над выполнением работ, то он не признается автором результата интеллектуальной деятельности.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.