Abstract

Agricultural land pawning is not a new phenomenon to the traditional communities (Masyarakat Adat) in Indonesia, especially the matrilineal Minangkabau people who rely on their agricultural land for economic transactions. Based on the national law, customary law (referred to as Adat Law hereafter) is to prevail over agrarian issues in Indonesia. But even so, agrarian issues remain under the influence of national law. This study discusses the management of agricultural land pawning in the matrilineal Minangkabau society according to national, Adat, and Islamic laws. Despite its popularity, the Adat law approach in dealing with land issues, especially agricultural land pawning, has not been well accommodated under National Law. This paper investigates how agricultural land pawning is regulated in Indonesia, with a focus on the Minangkabau society in West Sumatra. This paper does not seek to promote one legal system over another, but instead, it intends to promote legal certainty in agricultural land pawning in West Sumatra. To show how the lack of legal certainty can lead to confusion and conflict, this study relies on the contradicting verdicts of an agrarian conflict case from lower courts to the Supreme Court. The study reveals that the contradiction between national agrarian laws, Minangkabau Adat law and West Sumatra local Regulation No. 16/2008 on Communal Land Tenure causes confusion within the community and the judiciary. Legal certainty is crucial to strengthening the rule of law and democracy in Indonesia, and the conflicting interpretations of agrarian laws belittle this concept. This study suggests that one way to deal with legal uncertainty regarding agrarian law in West Sumatra, and throughout Indonesia, is to promote a stronger and more just decentralization, which is increasingly important as the country faces the question of legal unification. The suggested decentralization effort would leave local issues to the authority of local legislations.

Highlights

  • Land administration has always been a delicate issue throughout the history of Indonesia, a country where a significant number of the population lives a pastoral life [1]

  • The absence of legal certainty is characteristic of a legal system that has become a tool of a political elite [16] or that has fallen into decay to the point that there is a wide difference in decisions from one district court to another, as shall be discussed later on

  • As agricultural land pawning affects a vast majority of the population, it is crucial to ensure legal certainty in agrarian law to create a safe business environment but more importantly to strengthen the rule of law and democracy in Indonesia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Land administration has always been a delicate issue throughout the history of Indonesia, a country where a significant number of the population lives a pastoral life [1]. Land is one of the most important productive assets and sources of livelihood for a vast majority of the Indonesian population, whose main income is derived from agricultural activities. Land, especially agricultural land, is used as collateral by Indonesians to secure loans from banks or private money lenders. This phenomenon is known to the Indonesian people as gadai tanah pertanian.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call