Legal Analysis of the Discrimination against Women in Relation to Shared Ownership in the Farms. Comparison between the Royal Decree 297/2009 and the Law 35/2011

Abstract

Women start from large differences with respect to the men in a variety of areas, among which is the rural world.We intend to compare the Real Decree 297/2009 and the Law 35/2011, both on shared ownership of farms. This is because there is a lack of recognition that puts it in the background, generating an invisibility and a carecimiento of the rights and obligations arising from the agricultural activity with respect to the man that has a marriage or a relationship of analogous affectivity.In this absence, both legal recognition, social reflection and value economic rural women, as visibility to which they are subjected, such regulation is doomed to contemplate the figure of shared ownership in the agricultural holdings in response to certain issues arising in relationship to it. Thus, constitutes an element of change in agricultural structures, in such a way that the rural women enjoy effective equality of rights in relation to men.Ultimately, the purpose of the regulation object of comparison is to promote and facilitate equality between men and women in the rural context, through the legal and economic recognition derived from their participation in the activity agrarian.