Abstract

The Central Bank of Malaysia and the Securities Commission Malaysia have suggested a consolidation to establish the Integrated Dispute Resolution Scheme (IDRS) for Malaysian financial consumers. The objective of the merger is to streamline and enhance the procedures for resolving disputes. This study examines the legal perspective in determining the most effective legal structures for resolving disputes efficiently. The study employs qualitative data and secondary data from Indonesia and Australia to acquire insights. The study emphasises the potential advantages of the IDRS, such as enhanced dispute resolution services, greater outcomes, and increased satisfaction for consumers seeking alternative dispute resolution platforms.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call