Abstract

Background Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) experience an excess risk of congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic inflammation plays a pivotal role in this increased risk. Despite the growing body of research on cardiovascular (CV) disease in RA, the key pathways underlying the development of abnormalities in myocardial structure and function associated with CHF remain obscure. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has been used to identify early functional and structural changes in the left ventricle (LV) before development of clinically overt CHF. We evaluated LV function and structure using a CMR in RA patients (pts) without cardiac symptoms, and determined the impact of non-biologic DMARDs and biologic DMARDs. Methods Consecutive RA pts and healthy control were enrolled. RA pts received biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) or non-biologic DMARDs (nbDMARDs). All subjects underwent evaluation of LV function and structure using non-contrast CMR. LV function was based on LV ejection fraction (EF), end-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (CO). LV hypertrophy was measured by absolute LV mass (LVM) and LV mass index (LVMI) determined by LVM/body surface area. Subjects were classified into four categories based on LVMI and LVM/EDV of control subjects, with the mean + 2 SD of each measure defined as elevated LVMI and LVM/EDV. Results We compared 90 female RA pts (mean age, 55.9±7.1 years) with a matched 20-patient control group (mean age, 52.7±4.6 years). 46 RA pts received nbDMARDs [43, methotrexate (MTX); 3, other drugs)] and 44 RA pts received bDMARDs [(18, infliximab; 26, tocilizumab) plus MTX]. The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) was significantly higher in the nbDMARDs group than in the bDMARDs group (p=0.002). Compared to the control group, the nbDMARDs group showed significantly higher LVMI and lower EF (p 1.02 (2) concentric hypertrophy (LVMI>66.9 and LVM/EDV>1.02 (3) eccentric hypertrophy (LVMI>66.9 and LVM/EDV <1.02 and (4) normal geometry (LVMI<66.9 and LVM/EDV<1.02. Among those with abnormal LV geometry, 32% of RA patients in the nbDMARDs group showed eccentric hypertrophy. 98% of RA patients in the bDMARDs group showed normal geometry. LVMI and EF were significantly associated with SDAI (r=0.567, p<0.001; r=0.412, p=0.02, respectively). Mass/EDV tended to be associated with SDAI (p=0.07). Adjustment for ESR did not modify the association of SDAI with EF and LVMI (p=0.017, p=0.005, respectively). Conclusions Biologics treatment may reduce progression of subclinical LV dysfunction and normalize LV structure in association with the reduction in disease activity. It can be presumed that active RA may be an important contributor to the development of myocardial abnormalities.

Highlights

  • Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) experience an excess risk of congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic inflammation plays a pivotal role in this increased risk

  • We evaluated left ventricle (LV) function and structure using a Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in RA patients without cardiac symptoms, and determined the impact of non-biologic DMARDs and biologic DMARDs

  • Subjects were classified into four categories based on LV mass index (LVMI) and LV mass (LVM)/end-diastolic volume (EDV) of control subjects, with the mean + 2 SD of each measure defined as elevated LVMI and LVM/EDV

Read more

Summary

Background

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) experience an excess risk of congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic inflammation plays a pivotal role in this increased risk. Despite the growing body of research on cardiovascular (CV) disease in RA, the key pathways underlying the development of abnormalities in myocardial structure and function associated with CHF remain obscure. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has been used to identify early functional and structural changes in the left ventricle (LV) before development of clinically overt CHF. We evaluated LV function and structure using a CMR in RA patients (pts) without cardiac symptoms, and determined the impact of non-biologic DMARDs and biologic DMARDs

Methods
Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.