Abstract

It is widely accepted that a tight coordination between carbon (C) utilization in the sink and C assimilation and metabolism in the source exists in higher plants. However, much of our current understanding is based on research from herbaceous plants, where the source and sink interaction is less sophisticated compared to woody perennials with a significant sink presence. Apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) is a good representative of the latter category, and its production and transport of sorbitol, in addition to sucrose, adds complexity to C regulation. In this study, four-year-old “Gala”/”M.26” apple trees were subjected to crop load levels at 2.5, 7.5, and 15 fruits/cm2 trunk cross-sectional area. Low crop load trees exhibited reduced leaf C assimilation and extra accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates (NSC). This was primarily a result of reduced activity of Rubisco and increased activities of key enzymes that synthesize starch, sucrose, and sorbitol. Among the NSC, leaf starch was found to be most sensitive to crop load and could function as a leading indicator for source–sink balance in apple. However, even the high crop load trees still retained a significant amount of NSC in leaves at dawn, demonstrating that apple is fundamentally different from herbaceous plants in the way it balances leaf carbon inventories at dawn with carbon export at night for sink growth.

Highlights

  • Carbon (C) assimilation and metabolism fuel plant growth and development

  • We found that leaf photosynthesis is closely linked to crop load in apple

  • The lower leaf photosynthesis measured in low crop load trees is primarily caused by reduced Rubisco activity via the long-term sink regulation of leaf photosynthesis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Carbon (C) assimilation and metabolism fuel plant growth and development. In terms of the source–sink relationship, it is widely accepted that a tight coordination between C utilization in the sink and C assimilation and metabolism in the source exists in higher plants [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. For Arabidopsis, the source and sink interaction is less sophisticated compared to plants that invest significant C resource to sink tissues [19]. Even for herbaceous plants with a significant sink presence, their source and sink interaction could be vastly different from woody plants [2]. More work on woody plant species is needed to provide a full picture of how carbon metabolism is regulated in higher plants [12,20,21]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call