Abstract
We analyze the viability of the office of President of Congress as a source of in the Continental and Confederation Congresses.1 Our primary interest is in institutionally grounded, as opposed to and separate from charismatic or personal, bases for leadership. We show that virtually every institutional support for power recognized to be at work in the modern Congress was absent in the Continental Congresses. We trace the origins of these limitations on power and potential to a series of decisions taken during 1774 and 1775 and substantially maintained and even elaborated over the fifteen-year history of the Congress. The result was that even though the institution was awash in leaders, men like Virginia's Peyton Randolph, Massachusetts' John Hancock, and New York's John Jay, stable and effective leadership from the office of President of Congress proved to be impossible.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call