Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022LBA02-01 EFFECT OF CANNABIDIOL OIL ON POST-URETEROSCOPY PAIN FOR URINARY CALCULI: A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED TRIAL Gopal Narang, Olufunmilola Adeleye, Kevin Wymer, Mitchell Humphreys, and Karen Stern Gopal NarangGopal Narang More articles by this author , Olufunmilola AdeleyeOlufunmilola Adeleye More articles by this author , Kevin WymerKevin Wymer More articles by this author , Mitchell HumphreysMitchell Humphreys More articles by this author , and Karen SternKaren Stern More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002670.01AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Post-ureteroscopy stent placement carries significant morbidity and pain which can interfere with daily life. This discomfort unfortunately leads many to opioid pain medications, which have a known risk of addiction. Cannabidiol (CBD) oil represents an alternative analgesic that has proven anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects. We sought to evaluate the effect of an FDA-approved CBD oil (Epidiolex) on pain control and opioid usage in the post-ureteroscopy setting. METHODS: This was a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care center. 90 patients undergoing ureteroscopy with stent placement for urinary stone disease were randomized 1:1 to placebo or 20 milligrams of CBD oil daily for 3 days post-operatively. Both groups were prescribed a rescue narcotic, tamsulosin, oxybutynin and phenazopyridine. Daily pain scores, medication usage and ureteral stent symptoms using the validated USSQ questionnaire were recorded for 3 days post-operatively. RESULTS: Both the placebo and CBD group were similar in pre- and peri-operative characteristics. We found no difference in average pain scores or opioid usage between groups post-operatively. Both groups endorsed similar discomfort with ureteral stents that affected their physical activity, sleep, urination, and daily life. Lastly, the majority of patients would have either mixed feeling or would be unhappy if they had to have a stent placed in the future. CONCLUSIONS: CBD oil showed no difference compared to placebo in minimizing post-ureteroscopic stent discomfort or opioid usage. Despite the availability of numerous analgesic agents, patient experienced notable stent related symptoms and would be unhappy to have a stent placed in the future. Source of Funding: Institutional © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e1041 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Gopal Narang More articles by this author Olufunmilola Adeleye More articles by this author Kevin Wymer More articles by this author Mitchell Humphreys More articles by this author Karen Stern More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.