Abstract

We present details of a lattice QCD calculation of the $B_s\to D_s^*$ axial form factor at zero recoil using the Highly Improved Staggered Quark (HISQ) formalism on the second generation MILC gluon ensembles that include up, down, strange and charm quarks in the sea. Using the HISQ action for all valence quarks means that the lattice axial vector current that couples to the $W$ can be renormalized fully non-perturbatively, giving a result free of the perturbative matching errors that previous lattice QCD calculations have had. We calculate correlation functions at three values of the lattice spacing, and multiple `$b$'-quark masses, for physical $c$ and $s$. The functional dependence on the $b$-quark mass can be determined and compared to Heavy Quark Effective Theory expectations, and a result for the form factor obtained at the physical value of the $b$-quark mass. We find $\mathcal{F}^{B_s\to D_s^*}(1) = h^s_{A_1}(1) = 0.9020(96)_{\text{stat}}(90)_{\text{sys}}$. This is in agreement with earlier lattice QCD results, which use NRQCD $b$ quarks, with a total uncertainty reduced by more than a factor of two. We discuss implications of this result for the $B\to D^*$ axial form factor at zero recoil and for determinations of $V_{cb}$.

Highlights

  • The study of quark flavor-changing interactions is a key component of the search for physics beyond the standard model (SM)

  • We present details of a lattice QCD calculation of the Bs → DÃs axial form factor at zero recoil using the highly improved staggered quark (HISQ) formalism on the second-generation MILC gluon ensembles that include up, down, strange and charm quarks in the sea

  • We tabulate values for hsA1ð1Þ at each heavy quark mass that we have used on each gluon field ensemble from Table I

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of quark flavor-changing interactions is a key component of the search for physics beyond the standard model (SM). The B 0 → DÃþl−νdecay (and its charge conjugate, which we abbreviate to B → DÃlν on) supplies one of the three methods used for precisely determining the CKM element jVcbj [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call