Abstract

When the sand compaction pile (SCP) method is implemented to improve loose deposits of sandy soils, its effect is evaluated generally in terms of increase in density, which is beneficial for reducing the liquefaction potential of the deposits during earthquakes. An additional advantage can be expected to occur due to concurrent increase in lateral stress. When the resistance to liquefaction is evaluated on the basis of SPT N-value or CPT qc-value, the increased resistance to penetration due to the sand compaction has been interpreted conventionally as being associated mainly with the increase in density. Therefore, in order to properly evaluate the effectiveness of ground improvement in compacted soils, it is necessary to quantify the effect of lateral stresses on the penetration resistance and liquefaction strength. In this paper, based on the results of SPT and CPT performed in a chamber box in the laboratory, the relationships between penetration resistance, liquefaction resistance and relative density were re-examined and the influence of lateral stress, expressed in terms of KC, was investigated. Although the results indicated that generally the resistance to liquefaction increases with increasing KC–value, little difference was noted when the density of the deposit was high. Based on the results, recommended charts incorporating the effect of KC were proposed.

Highlights

  • The cyclic resistance to liquefaction of in-situ deposits is evaluated from the penetration resistance obtained using standard penetration tests (SPT) or cone penetration tests (CPT)

  • When liquefaction potential is to be evaluated for natural or reclaimed sand deposits, the above assumption may be reasonable. When these deposits are improved by means of a sand compaction pile (SCP) or any similar methods, it has been common practice to evaluate the effect of improvement in terms of the resistance in penetration tests, which is considered mainly to reflect an increase in density of sand deposits

  • (3) the results of calibration chamber tests were analyzed in which SPT N–value or cone penetration resistance qc is measured under controlled KC–conditions for sand deposits prepared at different relative densities

Read more

Summary

SUMMARY

When the sand compaction pile (SCP) method is implemented to improve loose deposits of sandy soils, its effect is evaluated generally in terms of increase in density, which is beneficial for reducing the liquefaction potential of the deposits during earthquakes. When the resistance to liquefaction is evaluated on the basis of SPT N-value or CPT qc-value, the increased resistance to penetration due to the sand compaction has been interpreted conventionally as being associated mainly with the increase in density. In this paper, based on the results of SPT and CPT performed in a chamber box in the laboratory, the relationships between penetration resistance, liquefaction resistance and relative density were re-examined and the influence of lateral stress, expressed in terms of KC, was investigated. Based on the results, recommended charts incorporating the effect of KC were proposed

INTRODUCTION
EFFECTIVENESS OF SAND COMPACTION PILE METHOD
Mechanism of compaction
BASIC CONSIDERATIONS
DLM:Dilatometer
REFERENCE RELATIONS FOR NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED CONDITION
PENETRATION RESISTANCE AND RELATIVE DENSITY RELATION
Fine sand
Coarse sand Fine sand
From SPT Tests
From CPT Tests
Effect of KC on Penetration Resistance
Effect of KC on Liquefaction Resistance
RELATION BETWEEN PENETRATION RESISTANCE AND LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE
COMPONENTS CONTRIBUTING TO INCREASED LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE
Findings
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call