Abstract

During the Late Miocene–Pleistocene interval, a complex system of elongate foredeeps, the Po Plain-Adriatic Foredeep (PPAF), developed in the eastern sector of the Po Plain and in the northern Adriatic Sea, This system is the largest Late Miocene–Pleistocene complex of foredeep depocenters of the Periadriatic Basin with an overall length of 500 km and a width of 80–120 km.In the last 15 years, several Eni-Agip multidisciplinary studies analyzed the buried Late Miocene–Pleistocene succession of the central-eastern Po Plain and northern Adriatic Sea. Detailed revisions of biostratigraphy, chronostratigraphy, sedimentology, seismic interpretation and sequence stratigraphy were performed using the very large Eni subsurface dataset including over 500 deep exploration and development wells and regional 2D and 3D seismic surveys. The large availability of subsurface data, the preservation and the relatively moderate structural deformation of the studied succession were essential factors for the generation of a detailed three-dimensional geological model for the foredeep basins and also for the related ramp/foreland and thrust-top basins areas. The model, which is presented in this paper, may be considered, for the large volume of qualitative and quantitative information, as a reference model for tectonically active foredeep basins dominated by basin-scale sand-rich turbidite systems.During the Late Miocene, Pliocene and Early Pleistocene a severe tectonic activity affected the northern Apennine and the PPAF area. Due to the northern Apennine compressive tectonics, the PPAF underwent four regional phases of compressional deformation and depocenter migration towards the foreland (to the northeast). During these tectonic phases, four basin-scale tectonic unconformities were generated: the Latest Tortonian, the Intra-Messinian, the Intra-Zanclean and the Gelasian Unconformities.The sequence-stratigraphic analysis of the basin was based on the recognition of allogroups, i.e. major stratigraphic units bounded at base and top by the four regional tectonically-induced unconformities, and of their component sequences, mainly of tectonic origin, ranked on the basis of their physical scale.During the latest Miocene-to-Pleistocene time interval the foredeep shape was affected by a large variability in space through time, ranging from regular elongated shape to irregular shape, from simple foredeep to fragmented foredeep. A new evolutive model for the Apennine foredeep with two evolutive stages is proposed in this paper.The PPAF was a deep-marine basin with water depths usually exceeding 1000 m. Its latest Miocene–Pleistocene succession mainly consists of thick sequences of turbidite deposits. Basin-scale, sand-rich, highly-efficient turbidite systems were largely predominant in the foredeep. Thick-bedded sand/sandstone lobes and thin-bedded fine-grained turbidite basin plain deposits represent the most common turbidite facies associations. Paleocurrents are predominantly directed to the southeast, parallel to the foredeep main axis.The thick PPAF succession consists of the turbidites of the Bagnolo (latest Tortonian–syn-evaporitic Messinian), Fusignano (post-evaporitic Messinian), Canopo (latest Messinian–Zanclean), Porto Corsini (Zanclean–Piacentian), Porto Garibaldi (Piacentian–Calabrian) and Carola (Calabrian–Late Pleistocene) Formations.The fluvio-deltaic systems of the Paleo-Adda, Paleo-Mincio and Paleo-Adige Rivers, located along the Alps margins of Lombardia and Veneto foreland, provided the bulk of the PPAF siliciclastic sedimentary input. With the partial exception of the post-evaporitic Messinian, the clastic supply from the northern Apennine belt was subordinate.The Messinian depositional systems underwent dramatic changes due to the combination of the salinity crisis and Intra-Messinian morphostructural reshaping. This behavior was not associated with a unique, dramatic lowering related to the Messinian Salinity Crisis (MSC) but was modulated by a combination of factors like climatic changes, deformation phases, isostatic rebound and sediment flux.Stratigraphic relationships among decompacted coastal wedges suggest that the total lowering of the relative base-level did not exceed 900 m in the study area. This total drop was reached through three distinct base-level changes probably related to evaporation (ME2 Sequence), differential subsidence (ME3 Sequence) and regional uplift possibly associated to isostatic rebound (ME4 Sequence). The Zanclean (Early Pliocene) relative sea-level rise is estimated on the order of 800–900 m, with a shoreline landward shift in the foreland of at least 70 km. In the study area, the MSC was therefore recorded by an overall strongly asymmetric cycle where discrete events of various origin punctuated a relatively gradual base-level fall. During the entire MSC, the PPAF depocenters remained in relatively deep-water or deep-water conditions, associated with turbiditic sedimentation and locally to bottom currents.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call