Abstract

The chemical characterisation of archaeological glass allows the discrimination between different glass groups and the identification of raw materials and technological traditions of their production. Several lines of evidence point towards the large-scale production of first millennium CE glass in a limited number of glass making factories from a mixture of Egyptian mineral soda and a locally available silica source. Fundamental changes in the manufacturing processes occurred from the eight/ninth century CE onwards, when Egyptian mineral soda was gradually replaced by soda-rich plant ash in Egypt as well as the Islamic Middle East. In order to elucidate the supply and consumption of glass during this transitional period, 31 glass samples from the assemblage found at Pergamon (Turkey) that date to the fourth to fourteenth centuries CE were analysed by electron microprobe analysis (EPMA) and by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). The statistical evaluation of the data revealed that the Byzantine glasses from Pergamon represent at least three different glass production technologies, one of which had not previously been recognised in the glass making traditions of the Mediterranean. While the chemical characteristics of the late antique and early medieval fragments confirm the current model of glass production and distribution at the time, the elemental make-up of the majority of the eighth- to fourteenth-century glasses from Pergamon indicate the existence of a late Byzantine glass type that is characterised by high alumina levels. Judging from the trace element patterns and elevated boron and lithium concentrations, these glasses were produced with a mineral soda different to the Egyptian natron from the Wadi Natrun, suggesting a possible regional Byzantine primary glass production in Asia Minor.

Highlights

  • The elemental composition of glass reflects the raw materials and the techniques that were employed in its manufacture

  • A second group has both oxides at concentrations between approximately 1% and 2% and cannot be unambiguously classified as mineral soda, mixed natron-plant ash or plant ash on grounds of the major and minor element composition alone

  • The analytical data of the 31 glass fragments excavated from the late antique to late Byzantine contexts at Pergamon have revealed the presence of three main primary glass compositions, within which several sub-groups can be identified

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The elemental composition of glass reflects the raw materials and the techniques that were employed in its manufacture. The chemical analysis of glass can provide evidence about the origin of the raw materials, while the comparison of compositional data between archaeological sites can potentially reveal patterns in the production and the trade of glass. It is believed that these mineral soda glasses were produced on a very large scale in a limited number of primary glassmaking installations from two ingredients alone, namely imported natron (fluxing agent) and a silica source (network former) that was locally available. This implies that the remaining elements were introduced as contaminants of the main two ingredients. Most of the analytical data to date indicate an eastern Mediterranean origin for the majority of first millennium CE glass

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call