Abstract

A new perspective on the analysis of turbulent boundary layers on streamlined bodies is provided by deriving the axisymmetric Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations in an orthogonal coordinate system aligned with streamlines, streamline-normal lines and the plane of symmetry. Wall-resolved large-eddy simulation using an unstructured overset method is performed to study flow about the axisymmetric DARPA SUBOFF hull at a Reynolds number of $Re_L = 1.1 \times 10^{6}$ based on the hull length and free-stream velocity. The streamline-normal coordinate is naturally normal to the wall at the hull surface and perpendicular to the free-stream velocity far from the body, which is critical for studying bodies with concave streamwise curvature. The momentum equations naturally reduce to the differential form of Bernoulli's equation and the $s$ – $n$ Euler equation for curved streamlines outside of the boundary layer. In the curved laminar boundary layer at the front of the hull, the streamline momentum equation represents a balance of the streamwise advection, streamwise pressure gradient and viscous stress, while the streamline-normal equation is a balance between the streamline-normal pressure gradient and centripetal acceleration. In the turbulent boundary layer on the mid-hull, the curvature terms and streamwise pressure gradient are negligible and the results conform to traditional analysis of flat-plate boundary layers. In the thick stern boundary layer, the curvature and streamwise pressure gradient terms reappear to balance the turbulent and viscous stresses. This balance explains the characteristic variation of static pressure observed for thick boundary layers at the tails of axisymmetric bodies.

Highlights

  • Turbulent boundary layers (TBLs) on streamlined geometries often experience strong pressure gradients and streamline curvature and are ubiquitous in engineering applications 926 A18-1N

  • Constantinescu & Moin (2004) developed a method for solving the incompressible flow equations on unstructured grids that emphasizes discrete kinetic energy conservation, ensuring robustness without added numerical dissipation. This property is essential for performing large-eddy simulation (LES) at high Reynolds numbers, since by definition the LES does not resolve the viscous dissipation on the computational grid and in general one cannot rely on the subgrid model to remove energy from the smallest scales at the correct rate to ensure numerical stability

  • We follow by discussing the zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer (ZPGTBL) over the parallel mid-hull in § 4.6, where the curvature and streamwise pressure gradient terms drop out of the momentum equations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Turbulent boundary layers (TBLs) on streamlined geometries often experience strong pressure gradients and streamline curvature and are ubiquitous in engineering applications. For bodies with concave longitudinal curvature (e.g. DARPA SUBOFF hull), two adjacent surface-normal lines must intersect at some point in the flow field, which may be close to or within the boundary layer. This poses a problem for the analysis of boundary layer development. The coordinate system must allow the faithful analysis of streamline curvature for thick boundary layers attached to curved bodies, where the streamlines may not closely follow the curvature of the body These requirements are satisfied by the streamline coordinate system derived by Finnigan (1983) for two-dimensional flows.

Definition of the coordinate system
Simulation details
Numerical method
Background
Results and discussion
Overview of the flow field
Hull surface stresses and comparison to experiments
Hull boundary layer development
Overview of the thick stern boundary layer
Streamline-normal profiles of the stern boundary layer
Evolution of structures over the stern
4.10. Stern boundary layer momentum balance
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.