Abstract
Following the advice of Vermeer and Snell-Hornby about giving more attention to Schleiermacher’s views on language and interpretation when approaching his classical lecture on the two methods of translating, I shall here argue that his text is multilayered, with his National Translation Project above his epistemic insights into language and understanding. I propose that we invert the hierarchy, looking at hermeneutics in a way informed by the philosophy of language from the later Wittgenstein, as well as taking into consideration some major positions in contemporary translation theory. Ultimately, the paper deals with different conditions of possibility: that of the interpreter for translation and that of the conception of language for translation theory.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
