Abstract
Abstract The authors of Landscape Design: An International Survey, a wide‐ranging review of contemporary practice, are forced to conclude that they can find little solid evidence of substantial design theory underlying the schemes selected. This paper asks whether this is so, and uses insights provided by Lodewijk Baljon's technique of comparative design analysis (developed in his study of the entries for the Pare de la Villette competition) to examine the state of contemporary landscape architecture as it approaches the millenium.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
