Abstract

This paper presents a multi-criteria conceptual framework for decision-making processes during Territorial and Administrative Reform (TAR) relying on sustainable development principles. In general, TAR processes highly consider socio-cultural and economic factors, but they lack responsiveness to environmental dynamics of the context. While this practice achieves a fair allocation of the new administrative units’ centers, the border defining criteria are indistinct. Thus, we turn a spotlight on the environmental factors as fundamental criteria in TAR decision-making processes, especially the boundary definition stage. Topography, watershed, land cover, and natural conservation areas are among the proposed environmental measures. The research makes a real case of land cover data utilization as environmentally sensitive decision-making mediator. First, the CORINE Land Cover (CLC) data of 2012 serves as an evaluation criteria of the recent TAR (2014) in Albanian territory, based on the landscape fragmentation caused by the new spatial division. Second, the CLC data generates an alternative municipal boundary of the Albanian capital. The results show that a TAR process not taking into account the environmental criteria leads to functionally disconnected territories which in the long run may lead to physically fragmented natural landscapes. Furthermore, the new alignment for municipal borders of Tirana shows a successful result in minimizing natural landscape fragmentation caused by local administrative boundaries. The proposed multi-criteria conceptual framework and the application via CLC utilization presents a methodical approach which may assist decision-making processes of TAR in other developing countries, conform sustainable territorial management principles.

Highlights

  • The conflict between the political borders and cross-boundary ecoregions is a well-known issue in conservation studies (Kark et al, 2015)

  • Our objective is to test the land cover data set as an environmental factor which might serve as a measure to criticize and improve the current, local administrative reform in Albania (Figure 2(a))

  • Results & discussions We organize the results of this research into two main tiers. It delivers information about the landscape fragmentation caused by the current, local administrative borders with an emphasis on the natural landscapes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The conflict between the political borders and cross-boundary ecoregions is a well-known issue in conservation studies (Kark et al, 2015). The main contradiction relies on the transboundary character of ecological services (Hoffman, Varady, Flessa, & Balvanera, 2009), while specific governmental bodies perform the conservation planning practice within the boundary jurisdiction. This practice significantly brings uncoordinated interventions (Jantke & Schneider, 2010) and sometimes even interfering/overlapping/duplicating each other (Gordon, Bastin, Langford, Lechner, & Bekessy, 2013). The international collaboration in natural conservation agendas might be the only solution toward cross-border conservation goals This is due to the fact that the national borders apparently are a product of the most extreme conflicts (wars) among the humankind (Harvey & Most, 1976), and their readjustment is the last considerable alternative on the table

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call