Abstract

Dynamic changes in the landscape have been observed in recent years. They are particularly visible in areas with a high degree of anthropopressure. An example of such areas is metropolitan regions and their immediate rural surroundings. The purpose of this article is to identify changes in land cover in the rural municipalities within metropolises and detect the processes of landscape transformation in rural areas, which are extremely sensitive to anthropopressure. The dynamics of land cover changes in the years 2000–2018 were determined using a change index (ChI), and their directions were determined using the indicator of changes in types of land cover. Corine Land Cover for level 2 groups (1.1–4.2) was used as research material, and the Upper Silesia-Zagłębie Metropolis was selected as the model area. The greatest changes in the landscape were observed in built-up areas, industrial areas, meadows and mining areas. This is due to the disappearance of the mining industry that was traditional for this region and the ongoing suburbanization process, as well as the re-industrialization of modern industry and the abandonment of arable land in rural areas.

Highlights

  • Corine Land Cover for level 2 groups (1.1–4.2) was used as research material, and the Upper Silesia-Zagłebie Metropolis was selected as the model area

  • This is due to the disappearance of the mining industry that was traditional for this region and the ongoing suburbanization process, as well as the re-industrialization of modern industry and the abandonment of arable land in rural areas

  • In Chełm Slaski, Mierzecice, Ozarowice and Bojszowy it was between 5.0% and 8.0%, while the highest values were achieved in Kobiór (ICh = 9.33%) and Bobrowniki (ICh = 15.88%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urbanization processes are diffusive in nature, beginning in urban centers and gradually moving to rural areas [2] This stage is called the suburbanization phase, i.e., a further increase in the population of the agglomeration, but with greater dynamics in peripheral areas [3]. The conduct of these processes is evident in areas directly neighboring large urban centers. Areas under the direct influence of urban processes emerge around large urban centers This zone can be created by various administrative units, both small- and medium-sized cities, as well as urban–rural and rural municipalities [4]. Suburbanization is an internal process in metropolitan areas

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call