Abstract

Upstream anthropogenic land cover can degrade source drinking water quality and thereby inhibit the ability of a community water system to provide safe drinking water. This study aimed to predict differences in Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) compliance between water systems based on upstream land cover in Central Appalachia and to examine whether national trends correlating violations with system size and source type were relevant for this region. Multiple generalized linear mixed models assessed relationships between SDWA violations and the distance weighted land cover proportions associated with the water system's contributing source watershed, as well as county economic status, system size, and water source. Results indicate that rates of monitoring and reporting violations were significantly higher for smaller water systems in more economically distressed counties. Interestingly, increases in surface mining landuse and high density development decreased monitoring and reporting violations, which may reflect impacts of associated economic development. Increases in low intensity development increased the likelihood of health-based violations. To protect public health, community managers should consider source water protection and/or upgrading drinking water system treatment capacity prior to developing previously undeveloped areas and further motivate compliance with monitoring and reporting requirements.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call