Abstract

Two mixed-ligand copper(II) complexes [{Cu(L 1)(μ 1,3-N 3)}{Cu(L)(μ 1,3-N 3)(μ 1,1-N 3)}] n ( 1) [HL 1 = 1-( N-ortho-hydroxyacetophenimino)-2,2-dimethyl-aminoethane; L = 2-(dimethylamino)-ethylamine] and [{Cu(L 2)(μ 1,3-N 3)}{Cu(L)(μ 1,3-N 3)(μ 1,1-N 3)}] n ( 2) [HL 2 = 1-( N-5-methoxy-ortho-hydroxyacetophenimino)-2,2-dimethyl-aminoethane] have been formed upon addition of aqueous solution of sodium azide to a methanolic solution of copper nitrate trihydrate and corresponding Schiff-base ligands. The ligands, HL 1 and HL 2 undergo partial hydrolysis of their imine bond during the course of reaction. Both the complexes contain single end-to-end (μ 1,3) azido bridged 1D infinite chains (rail) which propagate parallel to the crystallographic b-axis; neighboring chains are interconnected by pairs through double asymmetric end-on (μ 1,1) azido bridges (rung) to yield a ladder-like structure. In both complexes, rungs (end-on azido bridges) do not connect copper centers of the chains like in a regular ladder; instead they connect only the alternating copper sites of the 1D chain. In a chain the coordination environment around copper(II) ions are not the same: while the {Cu(L 1)(μ 1,3-N 3)} and {Cu(L 2)(μ 1,3-N 3)} moieties have a penta-coordinated copper(II) center, the copper(II) ion of the neighboring {Cu(L 1)(μ 1,3-N 3)(μ 1,1-N 3)} or {Cu(L 2)(μ 1,3-N 3)(μ 1,1-N 3)} moiety has an octahedral coordination environment. The variable temperature (2–300 K) magnetic susceptibility measurements showed that the magnetic interaction between the metal centers in complexes 1 and 2 is dominantly antiferromagnetic. The results of magnetic model are in good agreement with the experimental data.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call