Abstract

The mouse is a useful preclinical species for evaluating disease etiology due to the availability of a wide variety of genetically modified strains and the ability to perform disease-modifying manipulations. In order to establish an atrial filtration (AF) model in our laboratory, we profiled several commonly used murine AF models. We initially evaluated a pharmacological model of acute carbachol (CCh) treatment plus atrial burst pacing in C57BL/6 mice. In an effort to observe micro-reentrant circuits indicative of authentic AF, we employed optical mapping imaging in isolated mouse hearts. While CCh reduced atrial refractoriness and increased atrial tachyarrhythmia vulnerability, the left atrial (LA) excitation patterns were rather regular without reentrant circuits or wavelets. Therefore, the atrial tachyarrhythmia resembled high frequency atrial flutter, not typical AF per se. We next examined both a chronic angiotensin II (Ang II) infusion model and the surgical model of transverse aortic constriction (TAC), which have both been reported to induce atrial and ventricular structural changes that serve as a substrates for micro-reentrant AF. Although we observed some extent of atrial remodeling such as fibrosis or enlarged LA diameter, burst pacing-induced atrial tachyarrhythmia vulnerability did not differ from control mice in either model. This again suggested that an AF-like pathophysiology is difficult to demonstrate in the mouse. To continue searching for a valid murine AF model, we studied mice with a cardiac-specific deficiency (KO) in liver kinase B1 (Cardiac-LKB1), which has been reported to exhibit spontaneous AF. Indeed, the electrocardiograms (ECG) of conscious Cardiac-LKB1 KO mice exhibited no P waves and had irregular RR intervals, which are characteristics of AF. Histological evaluation of Cardiac-LKB1 KO mice revealed dilated and fibrotic atria, again consistent with AF. However, atrial electrograms and optical mapping revealed that electrical activity was limited to the sino-atrial node area with no electrical conduction into the atrial myocardium beyond. Thus, Cardiac-LKB1 KO mice have severe atrial myopathy or atrial standstill, but not AF. In summary, the atrial tachyarrhythmias we observed in the four murine models were distinct from typical human AF, which often exhibits micro- or macro-reentrant atrial circuits. Our results suggest that the four murine AF models we examined may not reflect human AF well, and raise a cautionary note for use of those murine models to study AF.

Highlights

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, with prevalence that increases with age [1]

  • The right atrial effective refractory period (ERP) was significantly decreased in the CCh-treatment group (Fig 1C)

  • Burst pacing-induced tachyarrhythmia occurrence and cumulative tachyarrhythmia duration were significantly increased by CCh treatment (Fig 1D and 1E, respectively)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, with prevalence that increases with age [1]. Pharmacologic treatments usually increase atrial refractoriness to inhibit sustained reentry. Pharmacologic treatments often have ventricular pro-arrhythmic effects, which are contraindicated in some patient populations such as those with AF with concurrent structural heart disease. Non-pharmacologic treatments such as catheter ablation have issues of surgery complications and AF recurrence. An unmet medical need for a novel and safe anti-arrhythmic drug for AF remains [1]. To meet this need, establishing a human-translatable animal model is essential for evaluating new anti-arrhythmic therapies. The most commonly used models to date utilize large animals such as dogs, pigs and sheep that develop AF upon rapid atrial pacing [4]. Due to limited accessibility and high cost of the large animal models, there is a desire to use rodent models

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.