Abstract
In the realm of multi-label learning, instances are often characterized by a plurality of labels, diverging from the single-label paradigm prevalent in conventional datasets. Multi-label techniques often employ a similar feature space to build classification models for every label. Nevertheless, labels typically convey distinct semantic information and should possess their own unique attributes. Several approaches have been suggested to identify label-specific characteristics for creating distinct categorization models. Our proposed methodology seeks to encapsulate and systematically represent label correlations within the learning framework. The innovation of improved multi-label Naïve Bayes (iMLNB) lies in its strategic expansion of the input space, which assimilates meta information derived from the label space, thereby engendering a composite input domain that encompasses both continuous and categorical variables. To accommodate the heterogeneity of the expanded input space, we refine the likelihood parameters of iMLNB using a joint density function, which is adept at handling the amalgamation of data types. We subject our enhanced iMLNB model to a rigorous empirical evaluation, utilizing six benchmark datasets. The performance of our approach is gauged against the traditional multi-label Naïve Bayes (MLNB) algorithm and is quantified through a suite of evaluation metrics. The empirical results not only affirm the competitive edge of our proposed method over the conventional MLNB but also demonstrate its superiority across the aforementioned metrics. This underscores the efficacy of modeling label dependencies in multi-label learning environments and positions our approach as a significant contribution to the field.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.