Abstract

Experts are crucial in legal disputes that involve technical matters beyond a judge's competence. Procedural requirements and the judge's assessment of an expert's conclusions provide control guarantees to ensure the reliability of scientific expertise. Experts are obligated to follow objective and rigorous investigation processes, with a professional duty to accuracy and logical approaches. This article examines how judges can control the scientific rigor of experts’ approaches.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call