Abstract

espanolEl articulo ofrece un marco general respecto a como se planteo la relacion entre derecho y democracia en el inicio del proceso transicional argentino de 1983. Para ello se analizan los debates juridico-politicos que impulsaron la politica de justicia transicional del gobierno de Raul Alfonsin (1983-1989). En particular, se focaliza en la argumentacion juridica con la que se anulo la amnistia aprobada por la ultima dictadura militar (1976-1983), lo cual supuso un quiebre en la doctrina de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nacion que daba validez juridica a los gobiernos de facto. Esto significo una nueva forma de asumir el problema de la legitimidad en la produccion del derecho en la historia politica argentina. EnglishThe article provides a general framework for how the relationship between law and democracy was raised at the beginning of Argentina’s 1983 transitional process. For this purpose we analyze the legal-political debates that promoted the transitional justice policy of the government of Raul Alfonsin (1983-1989). In particular, we focuses on the legal argument with which it was repealed annulled the amnesty approved by the last military dictatorship (1976-1983), which was a break in the doctrine of the Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nacion that gave legal validity to governments de facto. This meant a new way of taking on the problem of legitimacy in the production of law in Argentine political history.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call