Abstract
The understanding of the "Science", "philosophy" and "morality" depends to some extent for the understanding of the rationality, then is clear that the fundamental problem is: what are the fundamentals that have several "philosophies" to provide what the rational is? This paper exposed a philosophic perspective of the problem of rationality in bioethics and this exposition we divide into three sections: first, describe a brief history of bioethics and the scope of this discipline. Secondly, we develop the issue of rationality under Nicolas Rescher, and the end, we exposed two ethics alternatives for the bioethics: 1) the Aristotelian phronesis and 2) the Kantian categorical imperative, which the rationality plays a different role.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Nóesis. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
