Abstract
This paper provides an interpretation of Aristotle’s criticism to thesolution to Meno’s Paradox suggested by Plato. According to Aristotle, whenPlato says that reminiscence (anamnēsis) is achieved, what is actually achievedis induction (epagōge). Our interpretation is based on two aspects: (1) semanticcriticism, since Plato’s use of the term anamnēsis is unusual; and (2) the theoryis not able to give an adequate explanation of the effective discovery.DOI: 10.5294/pecu.2015.18.2.1
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
