Abstract
According to the dominant structuralist view, a language system (la langue) can be approached on its own, independently of speech (la parole) as well as the plurality of world languages (les langues). Bally and Sechehaye established this presumed autonomy of the language system by means of dubitable editorial strategies. They inserted an apocryphal statement, according to which language (la langue) is a single and simple object of linguistic study, into the conclusion of the Course in General Linguistics, and they subsequently cited it in dedicated book reviews and specialized essays in linguistics. This so-called famous formula became a structuralist motto. It created an impression of a seamless transition from Saussureanism to structuralism. Furthermore, the editorial presentation of Saussure’s argument in the Introduction to the Course tends to overstate the distinction between la langue and la parole such that la langue alone is deemed an object worthy of scientific interest.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
