Abstract
The influential account of the arbitrary linguistic sign in the Course in General Linguistics is ultimately revised in the course of Saussure’s lectures in favor of a differential conception of signification, one which is situated within the sign system from the start. The systemic understanding of language remains, however, incomplete without considering the role that the speech community plays within the signifying process. Language is received from others, especially prior generations, and present social interactions consecrate linguistic change. Consequently, there is no language without society, and there is no society without language—they are co-constitutive factors of cultural signification. Focusing solely on the social dimension of language, however, risks that we disregard the temporal factor or regard language at a single point in time only. Language is always already historical. The sociohistorical dimension of the language system partially transpires in the Course, where it is acknowledged that language (la langue), considered independently of the social world, would be made “artificial”; this complicates the order of the hierarchical dichotomies (la langue and la parole, synchrony and diachrony) from the “Saussurian doctrine.”
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.