Abstract
The Supreme Court accepted an appeal on the merits, considering that the piece of land which ownership was claimed was sufficiently specified with the sketch submitted by the plaintiff and prepared by a surveying engineer. That drawing was made according to the boundaries indicated in the registration on the Land Registry, and the topographical survey was corroborated by the personal inspection made by the court. The use of yards as a measure to mark out the boundaries does not prevent the correct specification of the claimed land.
Highlights
The Supreme Court accepted an appeal on the merits, considering that the piece of land which ownership was claimed was sufficiently specified with the sketch submitted by the plaintiff and prepared by a surveying engineer
RChDP n.o 35 to mark out the boundaries does not prevent the correct specification of the claimed land
DL decreto ley DS decreto supremo ed. editora, edición eds. editores https HyperText Transfer Protocol Secure m metros m2 metros cuadrados n.o a veces núm. número op. cit. opere citato (obra citada) p. página pp. páginas
Summary
El 20 de abril de 2016, José Richard Chávez Cabezas presentó una demanda de reivindicación de retazo de inmueble urbano en contra de José Alejandro. 428 del CPC se denunciaba infringido, por cuanto la Corte de Apelaciones de Concepción estimó que la prueba documental (el croquis acompañado con la demanda) y la inspección del tribunal (el dibujo hecho en el acta levantada al efectuar las mediciones en terreno) eran contradictorias, pero sin elegir una sobre la otra, como se ordena en dicha regla. “la Corte recurrida soslaya la prueba consiste en la inspección personal del tribunal, [...] donde se ratifica que el retazo de terreno cuya reivindicación se pide está en el límite de los terrenos de ambos partes, colindantes por el lado norte del terreno del actor, y corre hasta el fondo en un rectángulo irregular [sic], cuyas medidas constan en autos y lo hacen perfectamente identificable” Correspondía, entonces, acoger la demanda y dar lugar a la reivindicación del retazo (cons. 5°)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
