Abstract
This article focuses on the role of the Supreme Court in the policy-making process in Argentina. Based on court rulings in pension cases rendered between 2005 and 2007, it analyzes the different ways in which the court influenced the design and implementation of pensions policy. Its main findings empirically confirm the Supreme Court’s growing role in public policy discussions. The tribunal has had a decisive impact both in the revision of the core guidelines of the pension policies designed in the 1990s, and in the construction of a new legal framework for ensuring the effective protection of pension rights.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
