Abstract
In this article the Author argues that J. G. Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre 1811 offers a sound model for explaining the conditions of semantics. The article begins by following the suggestion of Wolfram Hogrebe, who introduced the concept of archaeological semantic postulate to define the implicit condition for a sentence to be meaningful. The author maintains that in Fichte’s definition of the phenomenon of being we can find such a semantic postulate at a higher genetic level than the principle of contradiction indicated by Hogrebe. Moreover, WL 1811 offers an analysis of the steps through which the phenomenon displays itself - ability, as such, oughtt - which can be understood as the conditions for establishing a meaningful sentence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
