Abstract
This essay constitutes a contribution to think about the agonistic nature of the judicial discursive field, where positions or points of resistance establish relations of force where they struggle to formalize a certain ambit of justice. We direct our reflection to understand the functioning of modern litis from recognizing it in traces that offer works of Greek tragedy. The dramatic account of court scenes of Greek pre-law and Athenian popular justice represent inputs for the necessary elaboration of a genealogy of a judicial controversy that transmutes violence into law. The objective of this reflection is to contribute to a critical, insipient view that does not address the practice of jurisdiction without displacing the limits that normativist positivism has imposed on the analysis of its strategic modality.
Highlights
Summary
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
More From: Nómadas Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
