Abstract
Ado, the bishop of Vienne, wrote a universal Chronicle during the reign of Charles the Bald (d. 877). The identification of Ado’s principal sources (Quotvuldeus of Carthage, Raban Maur, Orosius, Jerome and Gennadius, Isidore, Bede, the Liber historiae Francorum and the Annales royales des Francs) enables one to understand which chronological and theological criteria the bishop chose and to conclude that Ado was not involved in a political objective, nor was addressed to a lay aristocracy, as it has recently been suggested. Ado writes a history of the church, the mystical body and the consistent institution of orthodoxy. He highlighted the value of a number of bishops of Vienne such as Mamert or Avit, without ever seeking to concentrate attention on the metropolis alone or to write Gesta. His will to dispel all form of dogmatic ambiguity asks us to see in the Chronicle his support for the teaching the bishop considered for the clergy of his diocese.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
