Abstract
This papers argues for theoretical clarification concerning technological change within the French school of regulation. A comparison is made with the economics of technological change of Schumpeterian tradition. Focus on the conditions of balanced growth in the regulation school are opposed to analyses of technical change and innovation. The latter are more concerned by endogenous economic impulses which provoke disequilibrium. Theoretical coherence requires from proponents of regulation that, if they want to analyze technical change, abandon some of the main assumptions of this school.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
