Abstract
The people of Yogyakarta are known for their tolerance, where people of different religions can coexist peacefully especially with Javanese traditions. But in Mangir, a village in Bantul, Yogyakarta, in November 12, 2019, there was a case of local residents rejecting the procession of ancestral prayer rituals by the Paguyuban Padma Buana (PPB) who claims to be followers of Javanese Hinduism. This study aimed at disclosing the elements and roots of conflict from the Mangir community's rejection towards Paguyuban Padma Buana. As a case study, it used conflict analysis approach through timeline and factor analysis techniques. The results showed that the open conflict between the two groups has occurred since 2012 with the main issue of syncretic ritual practices of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Kejawen (Javanism) that involve people from various religions. In addition, the Maha Lingga Padma Buana Temple as a place of whorship and rituals has also the license problems. Reconciliation was carried out between residents with the Padma Buana followers in 2015. Unfortunately it was violated by the Paguyuban Padma Buana and became a trigger of conflict back in 2019. The cause of this conflict is multiple factors, all of which are interrelated. However, the root cause of the problem among Mangir people is mostly related to traditional revivalism and the distribution of cultural tourism management authorities. This conflict makes them polarized and vulnerable to interests that can create the village atmosphere worse
Highlights
The people of Yogyakarta are known for their tolerance, where people of different religions can coexist peacefully especially with Javanese traditions
The results showed that the open conflict between the two groups has occurred since 2012 with the main issue of syncretic ritual practices of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Kejawen (Javanism) that involve people from various religions
Peluang dan Tantangan Gerakan Revivalisme Islam di Indonesia Pascareformasi
Summary
Artikel ini berdasar pada hasil penelitian lapangan yang menggunakan metode studi kasus dan dilakukan dalam dua tahap. Tahap pertama tanggal 13 s/d 14 November 2019, dan tahap kedua tanggal 30 Nopember s/d 7 Desember 2019. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara secara kelompok maupun individu, Focus Group Discussion (FGD), observasi, dan studi dokumen. Peneliti mendapatkan banyak informasi dalam forum klarifikasi dari Ketua PPB yang diikuti pihak-pihak terkait. Data pembanding diperoleh dari Muspika Pajangan dan pimpinan Desa Sedangsari. Peneliti memperdalam informasi dengan perangkat Desa Sendangsari, pimpinan PPB, ahli waris Mbah Bali, tokoh masyarakat, dan warga Mangir lainnya. Data sekunder (dokumen) diperoleh dari piminan PPB, Pemdes Sendangsari, Polsek Pajangan, dan Kankemenag Bantul. FGD pada tanggal 6 Desember 2019 melibatkan aparatur Desa Sendangsari, tokoh pemuda, tokoh masyarakat, dan tokoh agama. Data dan informasi hasil penelitian dianalisis dengan teknik time line of conflict analysis dan teknik factor of conflict analysis
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
