Abstract
This study aims to test the performance of the K-Means Cluster method with Fuzzy C-Means. The data used is data from the Inclusive Economic Development Index in 34 provinces in Indonesia in 2021. The data is sourced from Bappenas. The optimum number of clusters suggested using the Elbow method technique is as many as 4 clusters. By paying attention to the silouhette value the K-Means method is as good as the Fuzzi C-Means. However, the K-Means method is better than the Fuzzy C-Means model when viewed based on the criteria of smaller AIC and BIC values and a larger R 2. The provinces of Papua and West Papua have negative cluster means values for all variables so it is said that it is still lacking for all pillars of the IEDI. On the other hand, the provinces of DI Yogyakarta and DKI Jakarta have positive cluster means values for all variables so that they are said to be good in terms of the economy and opportunities and access but still have high inequality and poverty. Comprehensive and targeted policies are needed so that inclusive economic development in Indonesia can be evenly distributed and increased every year
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Jurnal Bayesian : Jurnal Ilmiah Statistika dan Ekonometrika
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
