Abstract

The subject of this paper is a synthetic view of the commentaries on three hunting acts in force: Czech of 27 November 2001, Slovak of 16 June 2009 and Polish of 13 October 1995. The authors of this paper are interested in eight commentaries (two Czech, one Slovak and five Polish) and seek an answer to three basic questions: what is the concept of work presented by commentators, in which way they put hunting law in a larger context of environmental law or nature protection law and what determines the attractiveness of a commentary as a tool to explain terms and institutions of hunting law.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call