Abstract
With over 375 participating communities worldwide, well-established networks in many parts of Europe, North America and Australia, and with initiatives in many developing countries, the Healthy Cities movement is widespread and, in many jurisdictions, continuing to expand. As the movement matures, interest in the evaluation of its successes and potential limitations has grown. But as yet there has been little systematic assessment of evaluation strategies for Healthy Communities (HC). In this paper, a number of principles are advanced as being fundamental underpinnings for knowledge development and evaluation in, of and for HC initiatives. It is argued that a participatory action research approach is called for, but also one that includes a critical social science perspective on health, as part of attempts at the local level to define appropriate conceptual models of HC practice from which to ground knowledge development and evaluation efforts. It is argued that one should pay close attention to the theoretical, ethical and political issues that attend the evaluation of HC initiatives, since ‘evaluation’ has become a politically and ideologically charged issue. In a subsequent paper (Part II, to be published in Vol. 11, No. 4), a number of substantive foci are reviewed as potential bases for evaluation within the parameters of the principles and methodology described in Part I.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.