Abstract
The primary role of academic marketing research is to generate and investigate knowledge claims about marketing. A primary role of marketing education is to pass on well established knowledge claims to our students, so that they can use them to guide marketing decision making. Unfortunately, researchers in marketing sometimes fail to establish exactly what claim they are making, or what claim they are investigating. As a result the claims we pass on to our students are often quite unclear, and even when they are clear they are sometimes poorly justified. We believe that much of the standard marketing curriculum consists of just such unclear or unwarranted claims. In this commentary we propose a procedure for clarifying and investigating claims to knowledge in marketing. As part of our exposition, we touch on some of the more seriously flawed claims in the marketing curriculum. Our agenda has three components: (1) Clarifying the content of a claim. (2) Distinguishing between different types of claims. (3) Investigating empirical claims and maintaining a healthy scepticism.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.