Abstract
This paper examines how Sri Lankan villagers adapt to the indirect effects of globalization. Historically established local identities have become contested and challenged through global processes not explicitly visible at the village level. It is shown in this paper that the significant increase of capital into the economy has created two distinct leadership structures, has altered cultivation practices and labor relations, and has transformed kinship relations. In the traditional low-capital economy, villagers relied on reciprocal labor exchange for cultivation work, but many now are relying on wage labor; this has altered the relation between villagers from one based on reciprocity to one based on wages and contracts. The leadership structure of the village had earlier centered around the socio-moral role of hereditary mosque leaders; this is now being replaced by one based on knowledge of market dynamics and national political structures. The centrality of kinship is also being perceived as a social cost rather than a benefit. These fields of social relations are now contested, as villagers adopt traditional, modern and hybrid strategies in various situations. The dynamics of these processes and their effects on cultural precepts and practices are analyzed using Harrison White's theory of identity and control.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.