Abstract

The relationships between politics and religion have always been the focus of Hobbesian literature, which generally privileges the theme of the Christian State, i.e. the union of temporal and spiritual power in a sovereign-representative person. This essay presents other perspectives of interpretation, which analyze the relationships between politics and religion in Hobbes’ works by using specifically metaphysical and theological categories – liberty/necessity, causality, kingdom of God, divine prescience, potentia Dei etc. – which allow us to reconsider the nature of political power (and the relevance of modern technology for the contemporary politics). The core of Hobbes’ argumentation concerns the theoretical status of determinism (i.e. the relationships between liberty and necessity) with regard to the reduction of «potentia» to «potestas» not only in political philosophy, but also in metaphysics and theology. In many passages of Hobbes’ works, then, it is possible to understand the role of God’s idea in the natural and political philosophy: God’s idea as first cause or as omnipotence is only a reassuring word useful to describe the necessary, mechanical and eternal movement of the bodies and useful to justify the materialistic determinism in anthropology and politics. Body and movement are the necessary fundaments of the universe which find in itself - without reference to the category of «possibility» in politics and in physics - the motives and the reasons of his own structure and function (from causes to effects).

Highlights

  • The relationships between politics and religion have always been the focus of Hobbesian literature, which generally privileges the theme of the Christian State, i.e. the union of temporal and spiritual power in a sovereign-representative person

  • This essay presents other perspectives of interpretation, which analyze the relationships between politics and religion in Hobbes’ works by using metaphysical and theological categories – liberty/necessity, causality, kingdom of God, divine prescience, potentia Dei etc. – which allow us to reconsider the nature of political power

  • In many passages of Hobbes’ works, it is possible to understand the role of God’s idea in the natural and political philosophy: God’s idea as first cause or as omnipotence is only a reassuring word useful to describe the necessary, mechanical and eternal movement of the bodies and useful to justify the materialistic determinism in anthropology and politics

Read more

Summary

Determinism and Divine Prescience

The theme of potentia Dei is found in the long and articulated debate between Hobbes and Bramhall on the relationship between liberty and necessity.[3]. Hobbes immediately identifies the underlying theological-political problem, i.e. the relationship between might and right in the Kingdom of God by Nature: “In the Natural Kingdom God’s right to Reign and to punish those who break his laws is from irresistible power alone”.10 At this level, there is not any obligation to obey God resulting from a covenant, an alliance, an agreement or a contract, but the divine right to rule arises clearly from nature. Constrain, the only actual one, is ascribed to the sovereign-representative person, not to God

The Reduction of “Potentia” to “Potestas” in Political Philosophy
Determinism and Power: “Potentia” as Cause in Natural Philosophy
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call