Abstract

The consistency of kindergarten and first grade teachers’ attitudes toward academically talented early entrants, relative to other types of students, was assessed in a survey conducted in a suburban school district. Teachers were asked to rank hypothetical candidates for their classrooms and to indicate the kinds of information about nonintellectual qualities that would be most helpful in evaluating each potential candidate. Kindergarten teachers consistently assigned lower ranks to early entrants than to other types of students; the rankings of first grade teachers were less consistent. Teachers who had taught early entrants did not assign higher ranks to these children than did teachers who lacked this experience. Information about a child's social maturity level was chosen as most helpful for evaluation of all types of children at both grade levels. Teachers suggested a variety of techniques for working with intellectually advanced students, but few made positive comments about the practice of early entrance. Procedures that might reduce teachers’ concerns about the social competence of early entrants are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.