Abstract
Abstract: This paper deals with the origins of the many, frequently quite unfavourable, criticisms made of Kelson's pure theory of law and reveals key characteristics of several stages in its growth; point out the importance of Merkl and Verdross' work in developing the pure theory of law as well as the driving forces behind Kelsen's attempts to formalise jurisprudence (the science of law) in order to set the stage for an accurate and unbiased study of positive law; he also assesses the significance of Kelsen's normativisms and offers his opinions on how the pure theory of law should be developed going forward and its impact on legal system and its application along with the case analysis
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
